?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Jin Shei Cover from sgreer

February 2016

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
2829     

Subscribe to

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com

May 20th, 2007

Jin Shei Cover from sgreer

Yes, and the Earth is flat too.

Sometimes I get truly terrified by the potential for willful idiocy that can be shown by the human race.

I'm particularly boggled by the fact that other people are REQUIRED to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the Earth actually, you know, MOVES - but these lunatics get away by throwing out a bible quote. Newsflash, folks - "Because I said so" isn't proof, either.

To field a phrase that seems particularly apt at this instance, good *GOD* - if the Deity, any deity that may or may not actually exist, is happy that his/her/its disciples are self-centered fools then this is no God that I want any part of. Give me a call when you can show me that what is valued is intelligence and open-mindedness as opposed to blinkered dogma, and we can talk then.
Jin Shei Cover from sgreer

Eternal rights

All writers out there - millon-dollar-advancees, midlisters, raw beginners, wannabes - should be aware of the Simon and Schuster perpetual-rights-for-all-time grab - any book published by S&S NEVER reverts to the author, it will languish in limbo forever and ever amen, just in case S&S can squeeze out an extra dollar out of it fifteen years down the line when some hapless person might want a single copy at some point. NO further resources allocated, NO budget, NO further promotion, like EVER - it's money for nothing, for them.

More details available here:

Agents Angered by SS Rights Grab
by Jim Milliot -- Publishers Weekly, 5/18/2007 7:29:00 AM


Agents are strongly objecting to a change in Simon & Schuster’s contract language that gives it the ability to retain book rights even if a title remains only in the publisher’s electronic database. "They’re rewriting the rules and saying rights will never revert back," said Brian DeFiore,

http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6444532.html


And if that link goes away, just Google Simon and Schuster contracts and I'm sure something will pop up - there's been lots of discussion about this all over the Net already.

They are the first - and they are getting a backlash of outrage. But let another publisher add this to their contracts, and the backlash will be less. Let a third, and it will become industry standard. And then we're ALL screwed.

As someone put it somewhere in this discussion, the situation works beautifully for publishers, with their gazillions of books - but most authors don't have gazillions of books in them, they have a FEW, and that's all there is. They now have the opportunity of taking their work back and trying to place it elsewhere, if the original publisher lets it go out of print. Under the new rules, that is no longer possible. Authors become indentured to a publishing house, and their work lives and dies with that publishing house.

Don't let this become industry standard. If your book goes to auction, exclude S&S unless they take part under current industry rules. Make your agents aware of that clause in the contract, and make it a deal breaker if it is not stricken. Sure, only first-tier big name authors have the kind of clout to make a BIG noise about this - but we are all in this together, and if NONE of us will play in S&S's new sandbox they might rethink the matter.

Pass it on.
Jin Shei Cover from sgreer

"28 weeks later"

Someday in the future I am sure that I will want these two hours back.

That is all.